Add/remove custom controls dynamically #138
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Google Maps Addon for the Vaadin platform, focusing on version increments and enhancements to custom control management within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@paodb FlowingCode/google-map#35 has been merged. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/test/resources/META-INF/resources/frontend/styles/google-maps/custom-controls-demo-styles.css (1)
21-31: LGTM: CSS styling is appropriate for a Google Maps control button.The styling provides a clean, material design-like appearance suitable for a Google Maps control. Here are some suggestions for potential improvements:
- Consider using relative units (e.g.,
emorrem) for font-size and margins to improve responsiveness across different screen sizes.- You might want to add hover and active states to provide better user feedback. For example:
.custom-control-button:hover { background: #f0f0f0; } .custom-control-button:active { background: #e0e0e0; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3) 0px 1px 2px -1px; }
- For accessibility, consider adding a
focusstate:.custom-control-button:focus { outline: 2px solid #4285f4; outline-offset: 2px; }src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/CustomControlsDemo.java (3)
38-39: Consider removing the@SuppressWarnings("serial")annotation.The
@SuppressWarnings("serial")annotation is typically used for classes that implementSerializable. Since this is a demo class and doesn't seem to be serializable, this annotation may not be necessary. Consider removing it to keep the code clean and avoid suppressing warnings that don't apply.
98-102: Reconsider disabling buttons on click for demo purposes.The
createDemoButtonmethod currently setssetDisableOnClick(true)for all buttons. While this can prevent multiple clicks, it might not be the best approach for a demo application where users might want to interact with the buttons multiple times.Consider removing the
setDisableOnClick(true)line:private Button createDemoButton(String caption) { return new Button(caption); }This change would allow users to interact with the buttons multiple times without needing to refresh the page, which is typically more desirable in a demo scenario. The button states can be managed through the logic in the click listeners instead.
1-103: Approve the overall implementation with a suggestion for enhancement.The implementation effectively demonstrates the use of custom controls in Google Maps, providing a good user experience with interactive elements. The code is well-organized and follows a logical flow.
As a potential enhancement, consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each custom control and button. This would make the demo more educational for developers who might be looking at this code to learn how to implement custom controls in their own applications.
For example:
// Custom control at the top center of the map CustomControl customControl1 = new CustomControl(customControlButton1, ControlPosition.TOP_CENTER); // Button to add a new control dynamically Button addCustomControl3Button = createDemoButton("Add Custom Control 3");These comments would provide context and make the demo more self-explanatory.
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapMarker.java (1)
Line range hint
1-424: Consider reviewing other files for new feature implementation.The update to the NPM package version in this file is the only change, and it has been approved. However, the PR objectives mention adding and removing custom controls dynamically, which is not implemented in the
GoogleMapMarkerclass.To complete the review of this PR:
- Verify that the implementation for adding and removing custom controls is present in other files of the project.
- Ensure that any new methods or classes related to custom controls are properly integrated with the existing
GoogleMapMarkerclass if necessary.- Update the documentation to reflect the new features and any changes in usage.
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java (4)
810-810: Simplify array conversion by usingtoArraydirectlyIn the
addCustomControlmethod, you're convertingcustomControlsto an array using the Stream API. You can simplify the code by using thetoArraymethod directly, which is more efficient and readable.Apply this change:
- this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.stream().toArray(CustomControl[]::new)); + this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.toArray(new CustomControl[0]));
820-820: Simplify array conversion by usingtoArraydirectlySimilarly, in the
removeCustomControlmethod, you can simplify the array conversion.Apply this change:
- this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.stream().toArray(CustomControl[]::new)); + this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.toArray(new CustomControl[0]));
45-47: Unused import statementThe import statement for
java.util.Liston line 46 is not used in the modified code. Consider removing it to clean up the imports.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
import java.util.HashSet; -import java.util.List; import java.util.Set;
59-60: Remove redundant initialization oftrackLocationIdThe
trackLocationIdfield is initialized tonullby default. Explicitly setting it tonullis redundant.Apply this change:
-private Integer trackLocationId = null; +private Integer trackLocationId;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- pom.xml (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapMarker.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapPoint.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapPoly.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/CustomControlsDemo.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GooglemapsDemoView.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/resources/META-INF/resources/frontend/styles/google-maps/custom-controls-demo-styles.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (8)
src/test/resources/META-INF/resources/frontend/styles/google-maps/custom-controls-demo-styles.css (1)
1-19: LGTM: License header is correct and up-to-date.The Apache License 2.0 header is properly formatted and includes the correct copyright information for Flowing Code, with years 2020-2024.
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GooglemapsDemoView.java (1)
51-51: LGTM! The new demo has been successfully integrated.The addition of
CustomControlsDemo.classaligns well with the PR objectives of adding functionality for dynamic custom controls. The placement at the end of the demo list maintains the existing structure and is consistent with the pattern of other demo additions.To ensure the
CustomControlsDemoclass exists and is properly implemented, let's run the following verification script:✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
CustomControlsDemoclass exists and is properly implemented.The
CustomControlsDemo.javafile is present and the class structure aligns with the expected design. The addition integrates seamlessly with the existing demos and adheres to the project's standards.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of CustomControlsDemo class # Test 1: Check if the CustomControlsDemo.java file exists echo "Checking for CustomControlsDemo.java file:" fd --type f "CustomControlsDemo.java$" # Test 2: Verify the basic structure of the CustomControlsDemo class echo -e "\nVerifying CustomControlsDemo class structure:" rg --type java -A 10 "class CustomControlsDemo"Length of output: 1641
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapPoint.java (1)
31-31: LGTM! Verify version consistency and check for breaking changes.The update of the
@flowingcode/google-mapNPM package version to 3.8.0 aligns with the PR objectives. This change is likely a prerequisite for the new features mentioned in the PR description (adding/removing custom controls dynamically).To ensure consistency and check for potential breaking changes, please run the following verification steps:
Please review the results of these checks to ensure there are no inconsistencies or potential breaking changes introduced by this version update.
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapPoly.java (2)
Line range hint
1-42: Clarify implementation of new features mentioned in PR objectives.The PR objectives mention adding/removing custom controls dynamically and a method to remove all existing custom controls. However, this file only contains an NPM package version update, with no visible implementation of these features.
Please clarify:
- Where are the new features for adding/removing custom controls implemented?
- Are there other files in this PR that contain the actual implementation of these features?
- If the implementation is solely in the updated NPM package, should this class or other Java classes be updated to expose these new features?
To help investigate this, please run the following script to search for relevant changes across the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for implementations related to custom controls # Test 1: Look for files with recent changes related to custom controls echo "Files with recent changes related to custom controls:" git log --name-only --since="1 month ago" | sort -u | xargs rg -l -i 'custom.*control' # Test 2: Search for new methods or classes related to custom controls echo "New methods or classes related to custom controls:" git diff --name-only HEAD~10 | xargs rg -n -i '(class|interface|enum|method).*control' # Test 3: Check for changes in other key files echo "Changes in other key Google Maps related files:" git diff --name-only HEAD~10 | grep -i 'googlemap'
42-42: Approve NPM package update and verify new features.The NPM package version update for "@flowingcode/google-map" from 3.7.1 to 3.8.0 is approved. This change likely enables the new features mentioned in the PR objectives (adding/removing custom controls dynamically).
To ensure the new features are properly implemented and documented:
- Verify that the new version (3.8.0) of "@flowingcode/google-map" includes the functionality for adding and removing custom controls dynamically.
- Check if any additional changes or new methods are required in this
GoogleMapPolyclass to support the new features.- Consider updating the class documentation to reflect any new capabilities related to custom controls, if applicable.
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapMarker.java (1)
42-42: LGTM! Verify new features in updated NPM package.The update of the
@flowingcode/google-mapNPM package from version 3.7.1 to 3.8.0 is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. This minor version bump likely includes the new functionality for adding and removing custom controls dynamically.To ensure that the new version includes the expected features, please run the following verification steps:
- Check the changelog or release notes for version 3.8.0 of the
@flowingcode/google-mappackage.- Verify that the new version includes the functionality for adding and removing custom controls dynamically.
- Test the new features in your local environment to ensure they work as expected with the
GoogleMapMarkerclass.pom.xml (1)
7-7: Version update looks good and aligns with PR objectives.The version change from 2.1.1-SNAPSHOT to 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT is appropriate for the new features being introduced (adding/removing custom controls dynamically). This minor version increment correctly reflects the addition of new functionality without breaking changes.
To ensure this version update is consistent across the project, let's check for any other occurrences of the version number:
✅ Verification successful
Version update is consistent across the project.
No additional occurrences of the old or new version numbers were found outside of
pom.xml, ensuring that the version update is properly localized and does not impact other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any other occurrences of the old or new version number echo "Searching for old version (2.1.1-SNAPSHOT):" grep -r "2.1.1-SNAPSHOT" . --exclude=pom.xml echo "Searching for new version (2.2.0-SNAPSHOT):" grep -r "2.2.0-SNAPSHOT" . --exclude=pom.xmlLength of output: 283
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java (1)
54-54: Update NPM package to the latest versionEnsure that updating the
@flowingcode/google-mapNPM package version to"3.8.0"is compatible with all existing functionalities and doesn't introduce breaking changes.Run the following script to check for any breaking changes in the dependency:
✅ Verification successful
Update Verified: The
@flowingcode/google-mapNPM package has been successfully updated to version "3.8.0" without introducing any breaking changes that affect current functionalities.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes in the updated NPM package. # Test: Review the changelog for version 3.8.0. Expect: No breaking changes that affect current usage. gh api repos/FlowingCode/google-map/releases --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name=="3.8.0") | .body'Length of output: 319
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/CustomControlsDemo.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMap.java (1)
54-54: Update of@flowingcode/google-mapto version 3.8.0The NpmPackage annotation has been correctly updated to version
3.8.0to include the latest features required for dynamic custom controls.
| public void addCustomControl(CustomControl customControl) { | ||
| this.customControls.add(customControl); | ||
| this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.stream().toArray(CustomControl[]::new)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Removes a custom control added to the map. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param customControl the custom control to be removed | ||
| */ | ||
| public void removeCustomControl(CustomControl customControl) { | ||
| this.customControls.remove(customControl); | ||
| this.setCustomControls(this.customControls.stream().toArray(CustomControl[]::new)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize addCustomControl and removeCustomControl methods to improve performance
Currently, addCustomControl and removeCustomControl invoke setCustomControls, which resets all custom controls. This approach can be inefficient, especially when adding or removing controls frequently.
Consider modifying addCustomControl and removeCustomControl to update the controls incrementally without resetting all existing controls. You can directly add or remove the specific control and update the map accordingly. This change will enhance performance and provide a smoother user experience.
| import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
| import java.util.ArrayList; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate import statements
Lines 45 and 46 both import java.util.ArrayList. This duplicate import is unnecessary and should be removed.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate import:
-import java.util.ArrayList;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import java.util.ArrayList; | |
| import java.util.ArrayList; | |
| import java.util.ArrayList; |
| this.customControls.clear(); | ||
| this.getElement().executeJs("this._removeCustomControls()").then((e) -> { | ||
| JsonArray jsonArray = Json.createArray(); | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < customControls.length; i++) { | ||
| CustomControl customControl = customControls[i]; | ||
| jsonArray.set(i, customControl.getJson(i)); | ||
| customControl.getControlButton().getElement().setAttribute("slot", "customControlSlot_" + i); | ||
| this.getElement().appendChild(customControl.getControlButton().getElement()); | ||
| this.customControls.add(customControl); | ||
| } | ||
| this.getElement().setPropertyJson("customControls", jsonArray); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential concurrency issue when modifying customControls
In the setCustomControls method, this.customControls.clear() is called synchronously, whereas this.customControls.add(customControl) is called inside the asynchronous callback of executeJs(...).then(...). This could lead to an inconsistent state of customControls if other methods access it before the callback completes.
Consider moving this.customControls.clear() inside the then block to ensure that all modifications to customControls occur sequentially after the JavaScript execution. This adjustment will help maintain consistency in the state of customControls.
Apply this diff to adjust the code:
public void setCustomControls(CustomControl... customControls) {
- this.customControls.clear();
this.getElement().executeJs("this._removeCustomControls()").then((e) -> {
+ this.customControls.clear();
JsonArray jsonArray = Json.createArray();
for (int i = 0; i < customControls.length; i++) {
CustomControl customControl = customControls[i];
jsonArray.set(i, customControl.getJson(i));
customControl.getControlButton().getElement().setAttribute("slot", "customControlSlot_" + i);
this.getElement().appendChild(customControl.getControlButton().getElement());
this.customControls.add(customControl);
}
this.getElement().setPropertyJson("customControls", jsonArray);
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.customControls.clear(); | |
| this.getElement().executeJs("this._removeCustomControls()").then((e) -> { | |
| JsonArray jsonArray = Json.createArray(); | |
| for (int i = 0; i < customControls.length; i++) { | |
| CustomControl customControl = customControls[i]; | |
| jsonArray.set(i, customControl.getJson(i)); | |
| customControl.getControlButton().getElement().setAttribute("slot", "customControlSlot_" + i); | |
| this.getElement().appendChild(customControl.getControlButton().getElement()); | |
| this.customControls.add(customControl); | |
| } | |
| this.getElement().setPropertyJson("customControls", jsonArray); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| public void setCustomControls(CustomControl... customControls) { | |
| this.getElement().executeJs("this._removeCustomControls()").then((e) -> { | |
| this.customControls.clear(); | |
| JsonArray jsonArray = Json.createArray(); | |
| for (int i = 0; i < customControls.length; i++) { | |
| CustomControl customControl = customControls[i]; | |
| jsonArray.set(i, customControl.getJson(i)); | |
| customControl.getControlButton().getElement().setAttribute("slot", "customControlSlot_" + i); | |
| this.getElement().appendChild(customControl.getControlButton().getElement()); | |
| this.customControls.add(customControl); | |
| } | |
| this.getElement().setPropertyJson("customControls", jsonArray); | |
| }); | |
| } |
This depends on the merge of FlowingCode/google-map#35 and the release of the new version of the web-component.This PR adds the possibility to add and remove custom controls dynamically. Also adds a method to remove all existing custom controls. Web component version was updated to 3.8.0.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Bug Fixes